How Does the MBTI Test Work? 16 Personality Types Explained

Based on Carl Jung’s theory of psychological types, the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) is a self-report questionnaire designed to categorize individuals according to their personality type.

By assessing preferences in how people perceive the world and make decisions, the MBTI outlines 16 distinct personality profiles.

These profiles are essential tools for understanding oneself, improving interpersonal relationships, and fostering personal and professional growth.

In the following sections, we will explore each of the MBTI types in detail, offering insights into their characteristics, strengths, and potential areas for development.

16 MBTI Types Explained

Here are the 16 MBTI types.


INFPs are introverted, intuitive, feeling, and perceiving individuals. They have a strong sense of morality and idealism and are deeply empathetic towards others.

INFPs are creative and often seek out meaningful work that aligns with their values. While they may seem reserved, they have a rich inner world that they constantly explore.


INTJs, or Architects, are strategic and logical thinkers who value knowledge and competence. They are highly independent and innovative and have a natural ability to turn theories into solid plans of action.

INTJs are often reserved but highly confident in their abilities, focusing on achieving their long-term goals with determination.


INFJs, or Advocates, are romantic, compassionate, and sensitive to the needs of others. They are driven by a deep sense of altruism and a desire to help others achieve their potential.

INFJs are intuitive and insightful, often understanding complex issues and people. They seek meaningful relationships and work that aligns with their values.


INTPs, the Thinkers, are analytical, innovative, curious, and keen to understand complex problems and theories. They are independent, value autonomy, and often engage in thought experiments.

INTPs are less interested in practical details than in seeking depth and understanding of their interests.


ENFPs, the Campaigners, are enthusiastic, creative, friendly, and free spirits who can always find a reason to smile.

They are highly empathetic and passionate about new ideas, people, and activities. ENFPs are versatile and open-minded and crave creative freedom and opportunities for personal growth.


ENTJs, or Commanders, are assertive, strategic, and decisive leaders who enjoy taking charge and bringing order to chaos.

They are highly rational and value efficiency, often leading with boldness and confidence. ENTJs are driven to achieve their goals and expect the same commitment from others.


ENTPs, known as the Debaters, are inventive and open-minded and enjoy exploring new ideas. They are enthusiastic and clever, with a knack for verbal sparring and debate.

ENTPs thrive on the challenge of solving new and complex problems but can sometimes neglect the finer details.


ENFJs, the Protagonists, are warm, persuasive, and inspiring leaders who are deeply concerned with the well-being of others. They are excellent communicators, capable of motivating and guiding others towards a common goal.

ENFJs are empathetic and make decisions based on their values and the needs of others.


ISFJs, known as the Defenders, are reliable, caring, and sensitive to the needs of others. They are dedicated to their responsibilities and take pride in their ability to assist.

ISFJs prefer stability and tradition, often working diligently behind the scenes to ensure the well-being of their loved ones and communities.


ISFPs, the Adventurers, are creative, sensitive, and passionate, often expressing themselves through artistic endeavors. They live in the moment and enjoy exploring the world with an open heart and mind.

ISFPs are profoundly empathetic and value harmony and personal freedom.


ISTJs, or the Logisticians, are practical, reliable, and honest, with a strong sense of duty. They prefer structure and order, applying logic and organization to their lives.

ISTJs are meticulous and take pride in their work, valuing tradition and loyalty.


ISTPs, known as the Virtuosos, are curious, practical, and hands-on learners, often skilled in using tools and understanding systems. They are adventurous and spontaneous, preferring to take life one day at a time.

ISTPs are independent and adaptable, often remaining calm in crises.


ESFJs, the Consuls, are friendly, caring, and eager to help, often taking on roles that allow them to serve others. They value harmony and cooperation and are excellent at organizing people and processes.

ESFJs seek appreciation and enjoy creating comfortable, well-organized environments.


ESFPs, known as Entertainers, are vibrant and energetic and enjoy life to the fullest. They are spontaneous, fun-loving, and enjoy being the center of attention.

ESFPs are compassionate and generous, often encouraging others to join them in exploring all the joys of life.


ESTJs, or the Executives, are organized, honest, and dedicated to getting the job done. They are natural leaders who value tradition and order, applying logic and determination to ensure stability and achieve their goals.

ESTJs are straightforward and expect efficiency and hard work from themselves and others.


ESTPs, the Entrepreneurs, are energetic and wise and enjoy living on the edge. They are pragmatic and analytical, with a keen sense of their environment, which makes them excellent problem solvers.

ESTPs are outgoing and enjoy stimulating experiences, often leading them to seek out adventure and action.

What Does the MBTI Measure?

I/E: Introversion or Extraversion

The dichotomy between Introversion (I) and Extraversion (E) is one of the core aspects of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI). Introverts are typically characterized by a preference for solitary activities and reflective moments, drawing energy from within.

They tend to process information internally and may take longer to respond in conversations, favoring depth over breadth in social interactions.

On the other hand, extroverts are energized by external stimuli and enjoy engaging with the world around them. They are often seen as outgoing and active conversation participants, preferring a vast network of acquaintances.

Extraverts are more likely to think out loud and to act out their decisions in real-time, thriving on the immediate feedback from their environment.

The Introversion/Extraversion preference also affects how the other cognitive functions are expressed. For introverted types, their dominant function is directed inward, making them more reserved but often deeply analytical or creative.

An introverted thinker (like an INTP) frequently ponders complex problems for an extended period before concluding. In contrast, an introverted feeler (like an ISFP) might have a rich yet private, emotional life.

Extraverted types direct their dominant function outward, actively applying their thinking or feeling judgments to the world. An extraverted thinker (like an ESTJ) generally has no trouble organizing people and resources to pursue specific goals.

In contrast, an extraverted feeler (like an ENFJ) often seeks harmony in their environment and interpersonal relationships, actively working to understand and meet others’ needs.

Interaction styles are another essential element that is influenced by the I/E dichotomy. Those who prefer introversion might adopt a more reflective interaction style involving listening, patience, and occasionally needing personal space to recharge.

Their contributions might go unnoticed in larger groups, but they shine in one-on-one discussions or written communications where they can take the time to formulate their thoughts.

Extraverts prefer assertive and dynamic interaction styles, often becoming the facilitators or energizers in a group setting. They spontaneously share ideas and can rally a team around a common goal, fostering a collaborative and spirited atmosphere.

They generally find such social settings stimulating and adept at navigating them.

Understanding these contrasts is critical for introspection and how we connect with others. Recognizing and appreciating how people may be energized or prefer to communicate can significantly enhance interpersonal relationships and workplace dynamics.

It helps set the stage for a more empathetic and effective interaction with a reserved introvert or an outgoing extrovert.

S/N: Sensing or iNtuition

Sensing individuals are the ones who ground a team in reality. They rely on their five senses to grasp information and are particularly adept at recalling and referencing past experiences.

These individuals focus on what is tangible and concrete, detailing the actualities others might overlook.

They are pragmatic, often excelling in practical affairs, and prefer structured, routine tasks where their attention to detail ensures precision and factual correctness.

Conversely, individuals who prefer intuition are future-oriented and see the big picture. They imagine possibilities beyond the present and are drawn to change and innovation.

Intuitive thinkers are the visionaries on a team, often proposing novel solutions and creative approaches.

They are less interested in minute details and more engaged in patterns, meanings, and potential outcomes. This foresight enables them to anticipate changes and navigate new pathways through uncharted territory.

In teamwork, the balance between sensors and intuition is crucial for success. Sensors will keep projects on schedule and ensure all details are managed while intuitively buoying the group with new possibilities and visionary goals.

However, the difference in focus can lead to conflicts if not managed well. Sensors might find intuitive too abstract and unfocused, while intuitive may perceive sensors as short-sighted or overly concerned with trivia.

When communicating across these preferences, it’s critical to reciprocate respect for different perspectives.

Sensors appreciate clear examples and tangible evidence in discussions, while intuitively, they favor overarching themes and conceptual frameworks.

Bridging the communication gap between S and N preferences might involve presenting the data (for sensors) backed with future implications of that data (for intuitive).

Sensing and Intuitive individuals bring complementary strengths to diverse environments, including the workplace. Sensors typically thrive in jobs requiring meticulous attention to detail, such as accounting or database management.

In contrast, strategic planning or product development roles may see Intuitive drawing on their strengths. Each preference type adds value in differing contexts, and ideally, teams should be composed of a mix of S and N types to maximize their collective effectiveness.

T/F: Thinking or Feeling

Just as the balance between Sensors (S) and Intuitive (N) in teams is crucial, the Thinking (T) and Feeling (F) dichotomy introduces another layer of complexity and potential for dynamic synergy in teamwork.

Thinkers make decisions based on objective principles and facts, aiming for a fair and logical outcome for all parties involved. They are critical and task-oriented, often focusing on efficiency and results.

Conversely, Feelers prioritize values and relationships, aiming for a more harmonious and personal approach to decision-making. This contrast can occasionally cause friction as Thinkers might perceive Feelers as overly emotional, while Feelers might see Thinkers as cold or indifferent.

To effectively manage the T/F divide, fostering an environment where each disposition is honored for its unique contributions is essential. For Thinkers, it’s about respecting their need for autonomy and relying on their logical reasoning abilities.

They value direct and candid communication. For Feelers, acknowledgment of their relational skills and empathetic approach is crucial. They flourish in atmospheres where their interdependence and focus on group dynamics are appreciated.

Teams need to leverage these contrasting strengths when facing challenges. Thinkers can dissect a problem and create structured approaches to solving it, unaffected by the emotional weight of the situation.

Their objective analysis can lead to breakthrough solutions that might be overlooked by those more influenced by the human aspect of the scenario. On the other hand, Feelers can ensure that solutions are palatable to all stakeholders, keeping morale high and facilitating cooperation.

They can soften the delivery of critiques, making feedback sessions more productive and less contentious.

Developing team strategies incorporating T and F perspectives can lead to more comprehensive and effective outcomes. This could mean pairing Thinkers and Feelers in processes requiring detailed analysis and considerate communication, like conflict resolution or negotiation.

Respect for each other’s methods will be crucial here, with an understanding that the final decision or outcome will likely be more vital for incorporating both viewpoints.

Finally, harnessing the dynamics of T and F can be particularly fruitful in innovation. Thinkers can contribute with their intense critical thinking skills and capacity for complex problem-solving.

In contrast, Feelers can tap into their intuitive understanding of others to ensure innovations are user-friendly and meet actual human needs.

This complementary set of skills allows a team not only to invent but also empathetically iterate on their creations, leading to products and services that are both groundbreaking and deeply resonant with their audience.

J/P: Judging or Perceiving

Judging (J) and perceiving (P) types approach and structure deadlines differently. Js typically appreciate tight schedules and clear-cut plans. They find comfort in organization and feel satisfied when they check items off their to-do lists.

This mindset benefits project management, as Js tend to drive teams towards meeting timelines and upholding standards. Js are the architects of structure within an organization, ensuring that ideas convert into actionable steps and attainable goals.

Conversely, Ps favor flexibility and spontaneity. They thrive in environments where adaptability is critical and are often the source of creativity and innovation when deadlines are not looming.

This can translate into an openness to change directions mid-project, which can either lead to significant improvements or, if not managed well, derail the project’s focus. To maintain balance, teams must recognize the value of J and P contributions, particularly in tasks that benefit from iterative development.

Time management is another area where J/P preferences are pronounced. Judging types often are punctual, plan their work, and work steadily towards deadlines.

Perceiving types may delay starting tasks, work in bursts of energy, and are comfortable finishing right at the deadline or a tad after. This dynamic can cause tension, but when harnessed correctly, it allows for a workflow that combines steady progress with the ability to capitalize on last-minute inspiration.

Regarding steering the team, Js leads in setting and maintaining the course. This includes regular progress checks and distributing workload to ensure that objectives are met sufficiently before deadlines.

Their contribution is essential for keeping the team aligned with the overarching goals and maintaining a high standard of work through timely execution.

Conversely, Ps act as agents of flexibility and spontaneous problem-solving. They excel in fast-paced, unpredictable scenarios where quick adaptations are crucial.

While Js keeps the project on a pre-determined track, Ps come up with on-the-spot solutions and alternative pathways that can be critical when unexpected obstacles emerge. This fluidity can save the day when rigidity fails and open the door to unconventional yet practical solutions.

By recognizing and leveraging the unique strengths inherent in J and P types, teams can build a robust approach to planning and execution, providing a solid foundation complemented by the ability to adapt and innovate on the fly.

What Are the Three Rarest MBTI Types?

The three rarest MBTI types are INFJ, INTJ, and ENTJ. These types make up less than 10% of the population each. They are known as the “strategist” types and possess a strong ability to think critically and strategically.

INFJs are known for their empathetic nature and intuitive insights, while INTJs excel in logical reasoning and long-term planning. ENTJs are natural-born leaders with a strong drive for success and achievement.

These rare types bring unique strengths to teams, such as deep understanding, analytical thinking, and decisive leadership skills. Their contributions can significantly enhance team dynamics and performance.

However, their rarity may also lead to challenges in finding like-minded individuals to collaborate with in the workplace. It is essential to recognize and appreciate the strengths of all MBTI types, including the rare ones, to foster a diverse and successful team environment.

What Is the Riskiest MBTI Type?

The concept of risk in terms of MBTI personality types is often associated with specific traits that predispose an individual to take chances or explore uncharted waters.

There isn’t a definitive answer to the “riskiest” type as all types can take risks; however, types known for their spontaneity and flexibility, typically associated with Perceiving (P) types, may appear more inclined toward risk-taking behaviors.

These individuals are less likely to meticulously plan every detail and more likely to leap into situations with an eagerness to adapt as they go.

Perceiving types, such as ENTPs and ESTPs, are particularly noted for their adventurous spirit. This temperament makes them more open to taking risks and less afraid of potential failure.

They’re the individuals in a team who propose bold, innovative solutions and are not deterred by the lack of a safety net. Their value lies in their readiness to challenge the status quo and their resilience in the face of setbacks, which are crucial for pioneering efforts and entrepreneurial ventures.

Intuition is another aspect that plays a significant role in risk-taking. Intuitive types, marked by the “N” in their MBTI, often look at the big picture and future possibilities.

This can lead to ENFPs and INTJs, for example, taking risks based on what they envision for the future rather than what’s tangible in the present. Their intuition can guide them through uncertain situations, making them more comfortable with ambiguity and, consequently, more willing to take risks.

Extraversion and introversion also affect how risk is perceived and acted upon. Extroverted types may be more willing to take risks simply because they are more comfortable with external engagement.

They thrive on interaction and often find the stimulation of risky endeavors to be energizing. Conversely, introverted types may take risks after deep reflection, and their actions might not be as visible.

They might, for instance, risk social disapproval for the sake of personal integrity or a deeply held belief.

What Are the Four Main MBTI Types?

The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) categorizes personality into 16 types based on four dichotomies: Extraversion (E) vs. Introversion (I), Sensing (S) vs. Intuition (N), Thinking (T) vs. Feeling (F), and Judging (J) vs. Perceiving (P).

Each type is represented by a combination of four letters, one from each dichotomy, such as ‘ESTJ’ or ‘INFP.’ Understanding these types offers insights into an individual’s preference in processing information and making decisions, affecting their risk-taking behavior.

Which MBTI is Most Anxious?

Intuitive types often grapple with anxiety related to the unknown or future events. Their propensity to look beyond the present moment and imagine countless possibilities, including adverse outcomes, can lead to a higher level of baseline anxiety than their Sensing counterparts.

Since Intuitives focus less on concrete details and more on abstract potentialities, they may find themselves prone to worry about things that may never come to pass, creating a persistent sense of unease about the future.

Which MBTI is the Most Introverted?

Among the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) personality types, Introverts (I type) often prefer internal reflection and solitude more profoundly. Notably, the INTJ, INTP, INFJ, and INFP types are characterized by their reflective nature and may be perceived as the most introverted.

These personalities focus on deep thoughts and conceptual thinking, preferring meaningful interaction over casual chitchat. Their orientation towards their inner world often allows for rich imagination and insightful ideas.

Still, it might also lead to a heightened sense of social anxiety due to overthinking social cues and interactions.

Which MBTI is Most Popular?

Though our focus has been on introversion and its nuances within the MBTI framework, extroverted types often come to the forefront when discussing popularity. Extroverts like the ESTJ (“The Executive”) and the ESFJ (“The Consul”) are usually seen as outgoing and social.

They tend to have a broad network of friends and acquaintances, which might contribute to perceiving these types as the most popular. Their effortless ability to navigate social situations and often charismatic leadership styles make them stand out.

Which MBTI Type is Most Single?

While intrigue surrounds the romantic status of MBTI types, pinpointing the most likely MBTI type is an intricate matter. It’s important to consider that introverted types may prefer significant time alone for introspection and might not aggressively seek out relationships.

Types such as INTJ or INTP, often absorbed in their intellectual pursuits and projects, could be single simply due to their inclinations towards solitude and independence rather than any lack of romantic opportunities.

It’s essential to explore the relationship between an MBTI type’s desire for independence and their likelihood of being single. Types that value autonomy might not prioritize seeking a relationship as highly as others.

For instance, the ISTP, known for their spontaneous and self-sufficient streak, may embrace a single life as it affords them freedom and the lack of obligation to compromise their desires or routines for a partner.

What Is the Most Feminine MBTI Type?

While describing a Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) type as “the most feminine” can be subjective and potentially misleading due to sociocultural interpretations of femininity, types often associated with traditional feminine traits typically prioritize empathy, nurturing, and harmonious relationships.

For instance, the INFJ and ISFJ types are frequently linked to these qualities due to their compassionate nature and tendency to prioritize the well-being of others.

INFJs, the Advocates, often embody feminine characteristics due to their empathetic, solid skills and desire for deep, meaningful connections. Their intuitive understanding of others’ feelings and needs allows them to be caring and supportive partners.

Their idealism and complex inner world, however, might lead them to set high expectations for potential relationships, becoming a reason why they may remain single until those expectations are met.

ISFJs, often labeled as the Protectors or the Nurturers, show a strong affinity for maintaining harmonious relationships and are typically very attentive to the needs of their loved ones.

Their Sensing and Feeling preferences contribute to a hands-on approach to care, and they often create a safe, loving environment for their partners.

This attribute correlates with traditional notions of femininity, where caregiving and nurturing are strongly valued.


The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator provides a framework for understanding personality that transcends gender stereotypes.

While certain traits may be traditionally categorized as feminine, it is crucial to recognize that such attributes are not confined to any one MBTI type. Each personality type encompasses a spectrum of feminine and masculine qualities, contributing to a person’s unique individuality.

Moving beyond gender-based typing, the focus becomes appreciating the diverse range of human expression and fostering growth without the constraints of outdated labeling.

Understanding and valuing the distinct characteristics of each MBTI type ultimately leads to more prosperous, more genuine connections and self-awareness.

Like the article? Share it with your friends!

Build unique personality profiles for your team to help them work more effectively together

Get your team on the same page
Aggregate the results of the world's most popular assessments for your entire team to help it work more effectively together